|
|||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Technical Discussion Formerly the Basement - Hardware and software nerds, unite! Who needs sunlight anyway?! |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Officer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TX
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Character: Silver
Class: Assassin
Race: Elyos
Server: Lumiel
|
If money talks then they should realize they are going to lose subs due to GG. Sure the folks here in the forum are a small percentage of the gamers, but if this many people here are having issues I am sure others are too.
Do you really think that Joe Blow the regular NA gamer is going to screw with GG for long? Probably not, and his sub money will be long gone. How many subs would it take for NCsoft to pay attention to this? A few hundred, a few thousand? At what point over the next few years will someone with some authority at NCwest look at the numbers and go, "Wow, subs are down and the comments left as the 1-3 month subs closed their accounts are usually "#$%^ gameguard". I wonder if we should remove GG?" With WoW (which is still terrible) being the juggernaut that it is, and SW: TOR and the new Final Fantasy game coming out the competition for the MMO market is going to be pretty brutal. Bear in mind that just because you do not care for any of these games does not mean the bulk of the NA gamers will share your views. If Aion wants to survive they need to remove GG. As it stands now it's a strong reason not to play this game and with the competition being so steep it's something NCsoft can't afford. __________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Soldier
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Character: Zorb
Class: Sorcerer
Race: Elyos
Server: Undecided
|
Quote:
__________________ buy high, sell higher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Officer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: TX
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Character: Silver
Class: Assassin
Race: Elyos
Server: Lumiel
|
Quote:
Warning: Installing Aion will also install the root kit Gameguard. This product will invade your system and while gameguard is active you will be unable to run most common gaming keyboards and mice, as well as most security products. Use of Gameguard could also lead to what seems like random process closures and the inability to use a long list of programs. __________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Star Officer
|
Quote:
__________________ ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Soldier
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Character: Zorb
Class: Sorcerer
Race: Elyos
Server: Undecided
|
Quote:
__________________ buy high, sell higher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Officer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Character: rickets
Class: Cleric
Race: Asmodians
|
/Signed
-Harms game performance by eating resources -Causes crashes -Its a rootkit -Disables GAMING keyboards and mice software. -Doesn't stop hackers -Costs NCsoft $$ So whats the plus side? __________________ insert cliche anime sig here:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | ||
|
Soldier
|
Quote:
There isnt really any need for a security program. As long as people report botters they will get caught. The thing is there is no solution as the botters will go around any and all security programs they use that's just how simple it is. The problem wont go away and using a prog like gg is like just trying to hide from the problem instead and just beliving the problem isnt really there. Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Commander
|
My guess is NCsoft is starting to give you guys a hard time about this .Also considering this post over at betaboards by Ayase:
Quote:
__________________ twitter aion-team feeds http://www.aionsource.com/forum/ncsoft-team-feeds/ order/delivery problems ? http://www.aionsource.com/forum/gene...rder-list.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Daeva
Join Date: Aug 2009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Race: Elyos
|
Quote:
Suppose GameGuard is ineffective at stopping bots, hacks, and cheats. This fact has been made self-evident by many before me, so I will not waste precious time and text proving this statement. So, your main arguments are as follows: 1)If Aion has no security software, then Aion will turn into a cheatfest filled with bots and hacks. 2)If players with to see GameGuard removed, then they should be constructive and provide alternatives. 3)If new (i.e. alternative) security software is installed, then users will circumvent it and cheat anyway. 4)If players wish to see GameGuard removed, then they should pay the settlement for NCSoft to have it removed. ------------------------------------------------------------- Now, step-by-step, we observe what is incorrect with these statements: 1) is inherently reliant on the assumption that security is adequately effective at stopping cheats and hacks. So, the assumed logical thought would be: If security software is installed, then cheaters will be stopped. However, statement 3) states that 'If new security software is installed, then cheaters will circumvent it'; and it is already supposed that GameGuard is ineffective. If GG doesn't stop hackers, and alternative security software doesn't stop hackers, then why should we propose alternate security systems for Aion that won't work at all? Points 2 and 3 cannot exist simultaneously, nor can points 1 and 3. So you can either say that security software will make no difference (!1) and therefore players shouldn't need to provide it (!2) and that hackers will circumvent it and make it pointless anyway (3), or you can say that security software DOES make a difference and that players should provide an alternate one, because there exists anti-cheat software that hackers can't circumvent and make pointless. (1 & 2 & !3)Now, regarding 4), I will simply state that NCSoft is a company. The product is their responsibility, not ours. If NCSoft makes a poor decision for their product, then they should take responsibility for it and take the losses for reverting that decision; or keep the decision and accept the losses from that. The players -already- pay NCSoft for providing a good product, this is represented by the subscription fee we give them as a service provider. If NCSoft receives a significant increase in prospective subscribers in return for removing GameGuard, then have the players not effectively covered the expenses for them, and moreso, craeated a long-term profit in return for short-term loss? If a group of potential consumers are willing to take the loss FOR NCsoft, then all the more power to them - but this is an exception, not the rule. We already pay NCSoft to settle the removal of GameGuard from their program; we do it with our subscription fees. I don't know how the economic system works over in Korea where the game comes from, but regardless of semantics, over in the US* (And undoubtedly a number of other Western countries that NC-West is serving, like our EU and I would presume Canadian cousins), the private company is responsible for satisfying the consumer in order to stay afloat, not the other way around. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Soldier
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Washington State
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Race: Elyos
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
General
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Niflheim
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Character: Elan
Class: Spiritmaster
Race: Elyos
Server: Telemachus
|
Quote:
And this is kinda stupid, since Wikipedia isn't really a good place to look for hacks... What if a real cheater finds an even better way to not disable GG, but simply outsma... Oh, it has already happened. Nevermind then. __________________ ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| bot, botting, gameguard, ncsoft |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|











Points 2 and 3 cannot exist simultaneously, nor can points 1 and 3. So you can either say that security software will make no difference (!1) and therefore players shouldn't need to provide it (!2) and that hackers will circumvent it and make it pointless anyway (3), or you can say that security software DOES make a difference and that players should provide an alternate one, because there exists anti-cheat software that hackers can't circumvent and make pointless. (1 & 2 & !3)







Linear Mode
