[Fiets]

Acceptable? I wouldn't say 60% success is acceptable. Unless you have billions you want to lose, don't even bother with 85. L90 at least.

[Jinxied]

Fiets, on 11 October 2011 - 06:53 AM, said:

Acceptable? I wouldn't say 60% success is acceptable. Unless you have billions you want to lose, don't even bother with 85. L90 at least.

Says the guy with 0 experience with eternals.

PS: 3xL85 >> 1xL90 ~= 24kk...(Spatalos prices) it's simply RNG it's either gonna proc or not.

This post has been edited by Jinxied: 11 October 2011 - 07:58 AM

[Dushatar]

Payed 35M for lvl 109 stone.
Payed 46M for medium supplements.
Failed +12

Oh well, I had 10 succeeds in a row before that, even 90% fail sometimes.

This post has been edited by Dushatar: 12 October 2011 - 05:28 AM

[aga123]

Dushatar, on 12 October 2011 - 05:27 AM, said:

Payed 35M for lvl 109 stone.
Payed 46M for medium supplements.
Failed +12

Oh well, I had 10 succeeds in a row before that, even 90% fail sometimes.

You really think that +10-15 has the same mehcanics/fail rate as +0-10? If so, you sir are stupid. If you can get 90% success rate on +10-15 I'd be amazingly surprised.

[Spyrus]

+1 with L69 ->troll for my Tac Officer

Yeah seems that 11-15 is 15-20% less meaning to me that you need L+5 level stone from the ones to 1-10

[XXArcanumXX]

l90(lesser supp)>>+11, l90(lesser supp)>>+12, l84(lesser supp)>>+13, l88(greater supp)>>+14, l95(normal supp)>>+15

That l84 was a mistake.

[Edgeliver]

Nice. I never have any luck in this game...

Edgeliver, on 03 October 2011 - 08:23 AM, said:

Ok here my story.

lev95 normal supp +11
lev95 normal supp +12
lev95 normal supp +13
lev96 normal supp +10
lev95 normal supp +11
lev95 normal supp +10
lev95 normal supp +11
lev96 normal supp +12
lev96 normal supp +10
lev96 normal supp +9
lev95 normal supp +8
lev91 lesser supp +7
lev89 lesser supp +6
lev90 lesser supp +7
lev90 lesser supp +8
lev89 lesser supp +9
lev89 lesser supp +10
lev99 normal supp +11
lev101 normal supp +12
lev103 normal supp +13
lev107 normal supp +14

stopped and won't try +15 )

[SmokinSick]

got my EC bow yesterday and tried to upgrade it

+2 with 55 stones ( )
+3 92 + supp
+4 92 + supp
+3 91 + supp
+4 92 + supp
+5 92 + supp
+4 92 + supp
+5 92 + supp

stopped after 120 million spend, and nerfes worth of billions ^^

try to go on when I have 200 million again, to save me from a heart attack when it fails

[valdamus]

have you guys noticed that the enchanting cast bar actually varies on speeds? like sometimes the cast bar goes flying and other times it goes reeaaally slow... anyone? any crazy theories?? is hard to ignore when a guildy +10 his 55 eternal with lvl 82s and only failed twice and says he just pays attention to the cast bar lol. crazy i know but i just failed twice with 88+ lesser sups and my tinfoil hads rapidly finds its way in my head!!

[SmokinSick]

valdamus, on 18 October 2011 - 05:53 AM, said:

have you guys noticed that the enchanting cast bar actually varies on speeds? like sometimes the cast bar goes flying and other times it goes reeaaally slow... anyone? any crazy theories?? is hard to ignore when a guildy +10 his 55 eternal with lvl 82s and only failed twice and says he just pays attention to the cast bar lol. crazy i know but i just failed twice with 88+ lesser sups and my tinfoil hads rapidly finds its way in my head!!

just take a bunch of 55 stones which will fail about 90% .. then make a fraps video and every time it succeeds look at the cast bar.

If there is something different, show it to us

[valdamus]

SmokinSick, on 18 October 2011 - 08:48 AM, said:

just take a bunch of 55 stones which will fail about 90% .. then make a fraps video and every time it succeeds look at the cast bar.

If there is something different, show it to us

you know i thought about doing exactly that.. then i started to think on how to edit the hole thing and got hungry made a trip to mc donalds and now i just wanna go to sleep. ZZzzz..

[Jahaudant]

Anyone have the table that shows the success rate when enchanting 11-15? It's in here somewhere.. can't find it!

[Spyrus]

I think there is not that table is only up to +10

[Jahaudant]

Maybe I'm going mad. I would swear I've seen a table with a considerable sample size that noted 11-15. The success rate seemed to cap at 50%.

Erf..

[youredaddy]

http://postimage.org/image/jopfwwlvr/

check the tip

[MechWarriorBK]

L86 x 8 , 7 failed +1 total with suple,
+1 to -7 l91 no suple no fail
+8 , +9 , l90 no suple
+10 l 91 no suple

[Jinxied]

Should I watch if they cast bar goes slowly or fast?... Just wanna check this theory... Which one according to you gives bigger chance - slow or fast one?

[SmokinSick]

Jinxied, on 04 November 2011 - 02:14 PM, said:

Should I watch if they cast bar goes slowly or fast?... Just wanna check this theory... Which one according to you gives bigger chance - slow or fast one?

use 1000 stones, and check which worked. then check the speed ^^

I always watched the cast bar, but I don´t see any changes at all.

I just got my bow to +8 with 95 stones and supps. I nyerking hate this game

[Jinxied]

Well,I see a change in the cast bar...it actually goes faster and slower but the question is... Does this matter at all?

[ZeroSeventy]

Jinxied, on 05 November 2011 - 10:18 AM, said:

Well,I see a change in the cast bar...it actually goes faster and slower but the question is... Does this matter at all?

Succeeded with fast, succeeded with slow, failed with them aswell... so hardly doubt it has anything to do. I asked few people in game about it, and all of them told me its about some particular animation that your character does before the cast bar reaches end. How true is that I have no idea :P Never noticed if my char does something when it succeeds and not do it when i fail... oO

All in all its just mathematic, so pure rng ;x had 5x 90+normal sups fail , and some crap 60s to succeed 2times in a row, than 3x 87 to get back to +5... no sups used. so go figure ~~

This post has been edited by ZeroSeventy: 05 November 2011 - 11:09 AM